From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Douglas-Roberts

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2022
S3 21 Cr. 603 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2022)

Opinion

S3 21 Cr. 603 (VEC)

10-28-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS-ROBERTS, a/k/a “Supreme Bey,” Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS, United States Attorney for die Southern District of New York. KRISTY J.GREENBERG, RYAN B. FINKEL, Assistant United States Attorneys CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS-ROBERTS, MATTHEW DANIEL MYERS ESQ., Attorney for Defendant.


DAMIAN WILLIAMS, United States Attorney for die Southern District of New York.

KRISTY J.GREENBERG, RYAN B. FINKEL, Assistant United States Attorneys

CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS-ROBERTS, MATTHEW DANIEL MYERS ESQ., Attorney for Defendant.

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE VALERIE E. CAPRONI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

WHEREAS, on or about April 27,2022, CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS-ROBERTS, a/k/a “Supreme Bey,” (the “Defendant”), among others, was charged in one count of a three-count Sealed Superseding Indictment, S3 21 Cr. 603 (VEC) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C) and 982(a)(7), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, on or about July 6, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Indictment and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C) and 982(a)(7), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), a sum of money equal to $117,123.24 in United States currency, representing proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $117,123,24 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with his co-defendant Terrence Williams, to the extent a forfeiture money judgment is entered against Terrence Williams in this case; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of the acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorneys Kristy J. Greenberg and Ryan B. Finkel, of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Matthew Daniel Myers, Esq., that:

1. As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $117,123.24 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with his co-defendant Terrence Williams, to the extent a forfeiture money judgment is entered against Terrence Williams in this case, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS-ROBERTS and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit. One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property. .

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas, 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.;

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Douglas-Roberts

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 28, 2022
S3 21 Cr. 603 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Douglas-Roberts

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS-ROBERTS, a/k/a “Supreme…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 28, 2022

Citations

S3 21 Cr. 603 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2022)