From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 12-0052 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 12-0052

11-30-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN DOE Purporting to be Mark David Hook


JUDGE TOM STAGG


ORDER

Before the court is the Government's motion to dismiss the indictment without prejudice. See Record Document 60. The defendant opposes the motion. See Record Document 61.

"The Executive remains the absolute judge of whether a prosecution should be initiated and the first and presumptively the best judge of whether a pending prosecution should be terminated. The exercise of its discretion with respect to the termination of pending prosecutions should not be judicially disturbed unless clearly contrary to manifest public interest." United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1975). Dismissal of the indictment is not clearly contrary to manifest public interest in this case. Therefore, the government's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the indictment is dismissed without prejudice.

The defendant's request for release on bond is DENIED.

THUS DATED AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana this 30th day of November, 2012.

______________________

JUDGE TOM STAGG


Summaries of

United States v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Nov 30, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 12-0052 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN DOE Purporting to be Mark David Hook

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 12-0052 (W.D. La. Nov. 30, 2012)