Opinion
23-6236
06-27-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMIE LUBELL DIXON, Defendant-Appellant.
Jamie Lubell Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: June 22, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00305-CMC-1)
Jamie Lubell Dixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Jamie Lubell Dixon appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Dixon's informal brief, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Dixon's motion. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review); see also 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:11-cr-00305-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED