From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dimatteo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 9, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA) (D.N.J. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA)

2013-10-09

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RALPH DIMATTEO, SR.

Eric W. Moran Matthew J. Skahill Assistant U.S. Attorneys Darren Gelber, Esq. Counsel for Ralph Dimatteo, Sr.


Hon. Douglas E. Arpert


CONTINUANCE ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J, Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (by Eric W. Moran and Matthew J. Skahill, Assistant U.S. Attorneys), and defendant Ralph Dimatteo, Sr., through his attorney, Darren Gelber, Esq., for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter because a medical condition has rendered the defendant physically unable to engage in meaningful discussions with his attorney, to participate in pre-indictment plea negotiations with the Government or to stand trial; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within thirty days of the date of his initial appearance pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and the defendant, through his attorney, having consented to the continuance and waived such right; and this being the eigth continuance sought by the parties, and for good cause shown;

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

(1) The defendant, through his counsel, has represented to the Government that a medical condition has rendered him physically unable to engage in meaningful discussions with his attorney, to participate in pre-indictment plea negotiations with the Government or to stand trial;

(2) The United States and the defendant have jointly represented that the parties desire additional time, upon the defendant's recovery, to discuss a pre-indictment resolution to this matter, which would render any subsequent trial of this matter unnecessary; and

(3) Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(4) and 3161(h)(7)(A), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest ofthe public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this 9th day of October, 2013,

ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, continued from the date this order is signed through and including December 16, 2013; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from the date this order is signed through and including December 16, 2013 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(4) and 3161(h)(7)(A).

_______________

HON. DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge
Form and entry
consented to:
_______________
Eric W. Moran
Matthew J. Skahill
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
_______________
Darren Gelber, Esq.
Counsel for Ralph Dimatteo, Sr.


Summaries of

United States v. Dimatteo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 9, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA) (D.N.J. Oct. 9, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Dimatteo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RALPH DIMATTEO, SR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

Citations

Mag. No. 12-2574 (DEA) (D.N.J. Oct. 9, 2013)