United States v. Dienhoue

Full title: UNITED STATES v. SYLVAIN DIENHOUE

Court: United States District Court, District of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 13, 2021

CRIM. 20-573 (D.N.J. Jul. 13, 2021)

Opinion

CRIM. 20-573

07-13-2021

UNITED STATES v. SYLVAIN DIENHOUE

HONORABLE SUSAN D. WIGENTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS

HONORABLE SUSAN D. WIGENTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[√] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

See attached.

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[]Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[]The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other: