Opinion
24-12204
08-15-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRADLEY DIEFFENBACHER, Defendant-Appellant.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00504-MSS-CPT-1
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, as duplicative because Bradley Dieffenbacher again seeks to appeal from his criminal judgment, which we affirmed in 2023 before he filed his instant pro se notice of appeal. See United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978) (holding that appellants are not entitled to two appeals); I.A. Durbin, Inc. v. Jefferson Nat'l Bank, 793 F.2d 1541, 1551 (11th Cir. 1986) (noting that federal courts may dismiss duplicative litigation to conserve judicial resources).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.