Opinion
22-7293
04-28-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. OMAR DIAZ-RIOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Omar Diaz-Rios, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 25, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00021-REP-2)
Omar Diaz-Rios, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Omar Diaz-Rios appeals the district court's order denying his renewed 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court's denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Diaz-Rios' compassionate release motion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Diaz-Rios, No. 3:10-cr-00021-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2022). We deny Diaz-Rios' motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED