From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Derisma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Mar 7, 2012
2:09-cr-64-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2012)

Opinion

2:09-cr-64-FtM-29SPC

03-07-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES DERISMA


OPINION AND ORDER

On February 18, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #251) to the Court recommending that Defendant's Motion to Suppress and Exclude Statements of Defendant (Doc. #216) be granted. No objections have been filed, and the time to file such objections has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Powell, 628 F.3d 1254, 1256 (11th Cir. 2010). A district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). See also United States v. Farias-Gonzalez, 556 F.3d 1181, 1184 n.1 (11th Cir. 2009). This requires that the district judge "give fresh consideration to those issues to which specific objection has been made by a party." Jeffrey S. v. State Bd. of Educ. of Ga., 896 F.2d 507, 512 (11th Cir. 1990)(quoting H.R. 1609, 94th Cong., § 2 (1976)). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

After reviewing the Report and Recommendation and the transcript of the evidentiary hearing, the Court fully agrees with the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the magistrate judge. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation and will grant the motion to suppress.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #251) is accepted and adopted, and it is specifically incorporated into this Opinion and Order.

2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress and Exclude Statements of Defendant (Doc. #216) is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 7th day of March, 2012.

_____________

JOHN E. STEELE

United States District Judge
Copies:
Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
DCCD


Summaries of

United States v. Derisma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Mar 7, 2012
2:09-cr-64-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Derisma

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES DERISMA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 7, 2012

Citations

2:09-cr-64-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Harling

This requires the district judge "give fresh consideration to those issues to which specific objection has…