From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Depue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 2, 2015
Case No.: 2:10-cr-121-RLH (D. Nev. Jun. 2, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:10-cr-121-RLH

06-02-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRETT DEPUE, Defendant.


ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Based on the pleadings and arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. After appeal and remand for a new trial, "trial shall commence within seventy days from the date the action occasioning the retrial becomes final, except that the court retrying the case may extend the period for retrial not to exceed one hundred and eighty days from the date the action occasioning the retrial becomes final if unavailability of witnesses or other factors resulting from passage of time shall make trial within seventy days impractical. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(e). Here, the action occasioning the retrial was the Ninth Circuit's memorandum disposition vacating Defendant's convictions and remanding to this Court for further proceedings. (Doc. 264.) This action became final when the Ninth Circuit issued the formal mandate on March 30, 2015. (Doc. 265.) Seventy days from this date is June 8, 2015.

2. The United States Attorney's Office submitted paperwork requesting Defendant's transportation from prison in Arizona to Las Vegas on April 21, 2015. Defendant was transported from May 5 to May 12, 2015, arriving at the Nevada Southern Detention Center in Pahrump, Nevada, on May 12, 2015. Ten of these days are excludable pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F), (e).

3. At the status conference on May 19, 2015, the Court canvassed Defendant regarding whether he wanted to represent himself or be represented by counsel. Defendant chose to represent himself. The Court set a trial date of July 27, 2015, and after the hearing moved the trial date to August 10, 2015. (Doc. 268.) Defendant stated that he no longer has discovery in this case, but that he was ready to proceed to trial immediately.

4. The Court ordered the government to reproduce discovery to defendant, which defendant agreed could be accomplished by providing discovery to his standby counsel. Discovery in this case consists of more than 88,000 pages and numerous audio recordings. On May 29, 2015, the government reproduced the two copies of the discovery to standby counsel.

5. In the last trial, the United States called approximately 33 witnesses. The United States anticipates that approximately this same number of people will be called upon to testify in the next trial.

6. On May 22, 2015, the government filed a motion to advance trial date. (Doc. 269.) On May 29, 2015, the Court held a hearing on the government's motion to advance trial. After consulting with both the government and Defendant, the Court set a July 27, 2015 trial date. The time from May 22, 2015 to May 29, 2015, is excludable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D).

7. A trial date sooner than July 27, 2015, is impractical based on the number of witnesses that the government must subpoena. In addition the government had to reproduce voluminous discovery to Defendant. A July 27, 2015 trial date will allow the United States reasonable time to issue and serve subpoenas to these approximately 33 anticipated trial witnesses. The additional time from June 8, 2015 to July 27, 2015, which is not excludable under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(D) and (F), is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(e), and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). The additional time is less than 180 days from March 30, 2015.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial set for August 10, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., is hereby vacated and advanced to July 27, 2015, at the hour of 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 6C. It is further ordered that the calendar call is advanced from August 5, 2015, to June 30, 2015, at the hour of 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 6C.

DATED this 2nd day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that the undersigned has served the foregoing UNITED STATES' MOTION TO ADVANCE TRIAL DATE AND PROPOSED ORDER on defendant Brett Depue's standby counsel Angela Dows by means of electronic filing, and on pro se defendant Brett Depue by mailing the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, to:

BRETT I. DEPUE, Pro Se, 81757-208

Nevada Southern Detention Center

2190 E. Mesquite Ave.

Pahrump, NV 89060

DATED this 1st day of June, 2015.

/s/ Ashlin Brown

Ashlin Brown

Legal Assistant to Sarah Griswold


Summaries of

United States v. Depue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 2, 2015
Case No.: 2:10-cr-121-RLH (D. Nev. Jun. 2, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Depue

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRETT DEPUE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 2, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 2:10-cr-121-RLH (D. Nev. Jun. 2, 2015)