From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dennison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 7, 2016
Crim. No. 1:05-cr-0405 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Crim. No. 1:05-cr-0405

11-07-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARYL DENNISON


MEMORANDUM

Before the court is Daryl Dennison's pro se motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate or correct a sentence pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). (Doc. 168.) Johnson held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA") was unconstitutionally vague and that increasing a defendant's sentence under the residual clause denies due process of law.

Dennison, however, was not sentenced under the ACCA. He was charged under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The guideline for that offense is USSG § 2D1.1. Dennison was accountable for at least 50 but less than 150 grams of cocaine, which resulted in a base offense level of 32. Because the offense involved a dangerous weapon, a two level increase was required, giving him an offense level of 34. This offense level was greater than the career offender guideline of 32, thus, the offense level of 34 was used. (See Presentence Report, p. 4 ¶ 27).

The Johnson case is not applicable to Daryl Dennison. The motion will be denied. An appropriate order will issue.

s/Sylvia Rambo

SYLVIA H. RAMBO

United States District Judge Dated: November 7, 2016


Summaries of

United States v. Dennison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 7, 2016
Crim. No. 1:05-cr-0405 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Dennison

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARYL DENNISON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 7, 2016

Citations

Crim. No. 1:05-cr-0405 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2016)