Opinion
Criminal No. 15-113 (MJD/HB)
10-21-2015
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Maksim Valentinovich Demikh (2), Defendants.
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Defendant objected to the recommendation to deny his motion for suppression of electronic surveillance evidence and to deny his motion to suppress statements made to law enforcement during a custodial interrogation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bowbeer dated August 12, 2015.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;Dated: October 21, 2015
2. Defendant Demikh's Motion for an Order Suppressing All Electronic Surveillance Evidence [Doc. No. 49] is DENIED;
3. Defendant Demikh's Motion to Suppress All Identifications of Defendant Obtained Through Unlawful Identification Procedures [Doc. No. 50] is DENIED;
4. Defendant Demikh's Motion to Suppress All Evidence Obtained From Unlawful Searches and Seizures [Doc. No. 51] is DENIED; and
5. Defendant Demikh's Motion to Suppress Statements Made by Defendant [Doc. No. 52] is DENIED.
s/Michael J. Davis
MICHAEL J. DAVIS
United States District Judge