Opinion
Case No. 18-CR-00230-WJM
05-25-2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDUARDO DELGADO-LEYVA, Defendant.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and REASONS FOR ORDER OF DETENTION
This matter is before the court for detention hearing on May 25, 2018. The court has taken judicial notice of the court's file and the pretrial services report . In addition, I have considered the proffer submitted by defense counsel and the arguments of counsel
In order to sustain a motion for detention, the government must establish that (a) there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be imposed in connection with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the defendant's presence for court proceedings; or (b) there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be imposed in connection with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the safety of any other person or the community. The former element must be established by a preponderance of the evidence, while the latter requires proof by clear and convincing evidence.
If there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed an offense which carries a maximum term of imprisonment of over 10 years and is an offense prescribed by the Controlled Substances Act, a rebuttable presumption arises that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community.
The Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), directs the court to consider the following factors in determining whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community:
(1) [t]he nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug;
(2) the weight of the evidence against the person;
(3) the history and characteristics of the person, including -
(A) the person's character, physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings; and
(B) whether at the time of the current offense or arrest, the person was on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial, sentencing, appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under Federal, State or local law; and
(4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person's release.
The government is requesting detention in this case. In making my findings of fact, I have taken judicial notice of the information set forth in the pretrial services and the entire court file. In addition, I have considered the proffer submitted by defense counsel and the arguments of counsel. Weighing the statutory factors set forth in the Bail Reform Act, I find the following:
First, the defendant has been charged in the Indictment with Illegal Re-entry of a Removed Alien Subsequent to a Felony Conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). Based upon the Indictment, I find probable cause exists that the defendant committed the charged offense.
Second, I find that the defendant was born in Mexico and is a citizen of Mexico. Defendant is in the United States illegally. There is an ICE detainer that has been lodged against the defendant. Defendant's employment status and time in the community are unknown. Defendant does not have a Social Security number. Defendant does not possess a Colorado Driver's License. Defendant has used one alias name and at least two alias dates of birth in the past. Defendant has been previously removed from the United States back to Mexico on December 10, 2010. Defendant has been previously deported from the United States back to Mexico on April 14, 2011 and on October 10, 2015. Defendant has suffered one prior failure to appear which resulted in a warrant being issued. Defendant has a pending misdemeanor case in the Albuquerque Metropolitan Court, Case No. T-4-DW-2002004753 wherein he is charged with (1) Aggravated DWI First ; (2) Open Container of Alcohol- First Offense; (3) Signal Required Before Turning; (4) Driving Without Insurance; and (5) Failure to Use Seatbelts. There is an Active Warrant in this case.
In light of these facts and the defendant's immigration status, I find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions of release which will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant. Accordingly, I order that the defendant be detained without bond.
Done this 25th day of May 2018.
BY THE COURT
S/ Michael J. Watanabe
Michael J. Watanabe
U.S. Magistrate Judge