From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Degollado

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 12, 2021
3:20CR637 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2021)

Opinion

3:20CR637

11-12-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS ALEJANDRO DEGOLLADO, Defendant.


JEFFREY J. HELMICK JUDGE

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO ACCEPT GUILTY PLEA

DARRELL A. CLAY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) and General Order 99-49 of this Court, this matter was referred to me, on consent of the parties, to: receive the defendant's unconditional offer of a plea of guilty; conduct the colloquy prescribed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 11; cause a verbatim record of the proceedings to be prepared; refer the matter, if appropriate, for pre-sentence investigation; and submit a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation indicating whether the plea should be accepted and a finding of guilt entered. Accordingly, this Report and Recommendation, along with the transcript or other record of the proceedings submitted contemporaneously, constitutes my recommendation regarding the plea of guilty proffered by the defendant.

1. On November 12, 2021, defendant, accompanied by counsel, proffered a plea of guilty.
2. Prior to such proffer, the defendant was: (a) examined for competency; (b) advised of the charge(s) and consequences of conviction; (c) informed that the Court may be required to give consideration to the advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines and of the possibility of a departure from the Sentencing Guidelines; (d) notified as to his/her rights; (e) advised that he/she was waiving all of his/her rights except the right to counsel, and, if such were the case, his/her right to appeal; and (f) otherwise provided with the information prescribed in Fed. R. Crim. P. 11.
3. I questioned the defendant under oath to ensure that the defendant was making a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea of guilty. Based on that examination, I find finds that the defendant's plea was, in fact, offered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.
4. The parties provided me with sufficient information about the charged offense(s) and the defendant's conduct to establish a factual basis for the plea.

In light of the foregoing and the record submitted contemporaneously, I find the defendant's plea to be knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. I further find that all requirements of the United States Constitution and Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 have been fully satisfied. Therefore, I recommend that the Court accept the plea of guilty and enter a finding of guilt.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Degollado

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Nov 12, 2021
3:20CR637 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Degollado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS ALEJANDRO DEGOLLADO…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Nov 12, 2021

Citations

3:20CR637 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 12, 2021)