From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. De Haro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 26, 2012
CASE NO. 1:04-CR-5327-AWI (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2012)

Summary

In United States v. De Haro, 22 How. 293, there was a grant made in 1843 by Governor Alvarado of California, and, with a possession of sixteen years thereafter, was held to be sufficient presumption of a legal grant, but there was no requirement as above stated with regard to the Court of Private Land Claims act.

Summary of this case from Hays v. United States

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:04-CR-5327-AWI

11-26-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO GONZALES DE HARO Defendant.

NICHOLAS F. REYES, #102114 Attorney at Law Attorney for Defendant ALEJANDRO GONZALES DE HARO


NICHOLAS F. REYES, #102114
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Defendant
ALEJANDRO GONZALES DE HARO

APPLICATION FOR EXONERATION OF PROPERTY BOND AND

RECONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY: ORDER

ALEJANDRO GONZALES DE HARO, by and through his attorney of record, Nicholas F. Reyes, hereby requests an order exonerating the property bond for reconveyance of real property in this action.

Real property owned by PIEDAD HARO was posted as collateral for the property bond for the release of defendant Alejandro Gonzales De Haro. On December 10, 2004 a Deed of Trust was executed and recorded in Fresno County (Document #2004-0276412) for the real property commonly known as(Receipt#100 200998):

6508 North Wheeler

Fresno, CA 93722

On January 7, 2008, Defendant Alejandro Gonzales De Haro was sentenced to 24 months custody. He has served his sentenced.

Therefore, it is respectfully requested that the property bond in this matter be immediately exonerated and that the property posted as collateral for the bond be reconveyed to Piedad Haro.

______________________

NICHOLAS F. REYES, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant

ALEJANDRO GONZALES DE HARO

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the property bond in the above-captioned case be exonerated and title to the real property be reconveyed to Piedad Haro. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. De Haro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 26, 2012
CASE NO. 1:04-CR-5327-AWI (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2012)

In United States v. De Haro, 22 How. 293, there was a grant made in 1843 by Governor Alvarado of California, and, with a possession of sixteen years thereafter, was held to be sufficient presumption of a legal grant, but there was no requirement as above stated with regard to the Court of Private Land Claims act.

Summary of this case from Hays v. United States
Case details for

United States v. De Haro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO GONZALES DE HARO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 26, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:04-CR-5327-AWI (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. United States

United States v. Halleck, 1 Wall. 439; Higueras v. United States, 5 Wall. 827; United States v. Hancock, 133…

Hays v. United States

See Lindsey v. Miller, 6 Pet. 666; Gibson v. Chouteau, 13 Wall. 92; Weber v. Harbor Commissioners, 18 Wall.…