From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 2:08-cr-070 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cr-070 MCE

09-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TRENT MARK DAVIS, Defendant.

ROBERT TICE-RASKIN Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey L. Staniels Assistant Federal Defender Counsel for Defendant TRENT MARK DAVIS


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

TRENT MARK DAVIS

CORRECTED STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING CASE, AND ESTABLISHING NEW

SCHEDULE FOR ANY OBJECTIONS TO THE

PRESENTENCE REPORT.

Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Robert Tice-Raskin, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for Defendant that the above case be vacated from this court's September 29, 2010, calendar, that it be continued until October 27, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. for judgment and sentencing proceedings. Since Mr. Davis previously pled guilty time exclusions under the Speedy Trial Act are not needed.

The court is advised that counsel for the parties have reached an agreed upon resolution of a pending sentencing factor, and the substance of that agreement has been communicated to the Probation Officer in the form of an informal objection letter. It is anticipated that Probation will concur with counsel's resolution.

The date requested allows time for consideration of this issue by Probation and for any alterations to the Presentence Report that result. It also permits Mr. Davis to arrange for a convenient flight from Louisiana to Sacramento at a relatively more economical cost.

The previously established proposed schedule for any additional objections to the PSR is, in light of this development:

Objections to the PSR (by either side) October 6, 2011
Opposition to Objections October 13, 2011
Optional Reply October 20, 2011
Hearing on Objections and Sentencing October 27, 2011

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ROBERT TICE-RASKIN

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

Jeffrey L. Staniels

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

TRENT MARK DAVIS

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
No. 2:08-cr-070 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TRENT MARK DAVIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cr-070 MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)