From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND VENUE
May 8, 2013
No. 13-70271 MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-70271 MAG

05-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TAMIKA DAVIS, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney RODNEY C. VILLAZOR Assistant United States Attorney JOYCE LEAVITT Attorney for Tamika Davis


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
RODNEY C. VILLAZOR (NYBN 4003596)
Assistant United States Attorney

1301 Clay Street, Suite 340-S

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: (510) 637-3689

Fax: (510) 637-3724

E-mail: rodney.villazor@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATED MOTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING

PRELIMINARY HEARING OR

ARRAIGNMENT DATE AND WAIVING

TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TO

JUNE 21, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this order pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d) continuing the arraignment or preliminary hearing date for Defendant Tamika Davis to June 21, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for the defendant believes that postponing the preliminary hearing is in her client's best interest and that it is not in her client's best interest for the United States to present an indictment before the current May 9, 2013 preliminary hearing date. The parties agree that - taking into account the public interest in prompt disposition of criminal cases - good cause exists for this extension.

Defendant also agrees to toll and to waive for this period of time any time limits applicable under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161. The parties agree and stipulate that defense counsel needs time to review discovery and that an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act for effective preparation of counsel is warranted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). Undersigned defense counsel represents that she has spoken with her client, and that Defendant agrees to the continuance and to time being tolled and waived as requested.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

MELINDA HAAG

United States Attorney

______________________

RODNEY C. VILLAZOR

Assistant United States Attorney

______________________

JOYCE LEAVITT

Attorney for Tamika Davis

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

KANDIS A. WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND VENUE
May 8, 2013
No. 13-70271 MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TAMIKA DAVIS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND VENUE

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. 13-70271 MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)