Opinion
22-6249
04-27-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EARL WHITTLEY DAVIS, a/k/a Baby Earl, a/k/a E, Defendant-Appellant.
Earl Whittley Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 25, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cr-00199-DKC-1)
Earl Whittley Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Earl Whittley Davis appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for compassionate release. We review a district court's denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 8:07-cr-00199-DKC-1 (D. Md. Feb. 7, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED