From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Davidson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 2005
134 F. App'x 222 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted: June 14, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Mark A. Inciong, Esq., William R. Reed, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Anne R. Traum, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00510-PMP.

Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Joshua Kristan Davidson appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We dismiss in light of the valid written appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, --- U.S. ----, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Davidson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 2005
134 F. App'x 222 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Davidson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Joshua Kristan DAVIDSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 17, 2005

Citations

134 F. App'x 222 (9th Cir. 2005)