From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Daugherty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cr-59 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cr-59

11-12-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAREY LYNN DAUGHERTY


JUDGE COLLIER


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CAREY LYNN DAUGHERTY ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on September 9, 2013, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included:

(1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government.
(2) The Supervised Releasee.
(3) Attorney Anthony Martinez for defendant.

After being sworn in due form of law, the Supervised Releasee was informed or reminded of her privilege against self-incrimination accorded her under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the Supervised Releasee wished to be represented by an attorney and she qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent her at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was APPOINTED to represent the defendant. It was determined the Supervised Releasee had been provided with a copy of the Petition and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with her attorney. It was also determined she was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents she had been provided

The Supervised Releasee waived her right to a preliminary hearing but requested a detention hearing.

The Government called USPO Danny Haimelin and moved that the Supervised Releasee be detained pending the revocation hearing.

Findings


(1) Based USPO Haimelin's testimony and the Supervised Releasee's waiver of preliminary hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe the
Supervised Releasee has committed violations of her conditions of supervised release as alleged or set forth in the Petition.
(2) The Supervised Releasee has not carried her burden under Rule 32.1(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, that if released on bail she will not flee or will not pose a danger to the community.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) The motion of the Government that the Supervised Releasee be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending her revocation hearing before Judge Collier is GRANTED.
(2) The U.S. Marshal shall transport the Supervised Releasee to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, January 9, 2014, at 9:00 am.

ENTER.

_____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Daugherty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 12, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cr-59 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 12, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Daugherty

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAREY LYNN DAUGHERTY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Nov 12, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cr-59 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 12, 2013)