From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Darwich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. 10-CR-20705 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 10-CR-20705

03-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-4 ALI DARWICH, aka "Abdullah Derbas,", Defendant.


HONORABLE ROBERT H. CLELAND


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2, and as the result of the guilty verdict rendered by the jury on or about December 13, 2012 against defendant ALI DARWICH as to Counts One through Twelve (Wire Fraud), Thirteen through Eighteen (Mail Fraud), Twenty through Twenty-Three (Mail Fraud), Twenty-Five through Twenty-Seven (Mail Fraud), Twenty-Eight through Thirty-Four (Use of Fire to Commit a Felony), and Count Thirty-Five (Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering) of the Fourth Superseding Indictment,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a money judgment in an amount to be determined by this Court is granted and entered against Defendant ALI DARWICH in favor of the United States of America.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture will be amended under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2(e)(1) when the amount of the money judgment has been determined by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the money judgment may be satisfied, to whatever extent possible, from any property owned or under the control of Defendant ALI DARWICH. To satisfy the money judgment, any assets that Defendant ALI DARWICH has now, or may later acquire may be forfeited as substitute assets under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p)(2).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2, once this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture is amended under Rule 32.2(e)(1), when the amount of the money judgment has been determined by the Court, it shall become the Final Order of Forfeiture at the time of Defendant's sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the Judgment, and shall not be the subject of ancillary proceedings given that the forfeiture consists entirely of a money judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2(e).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, March 22, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

United States v. Darwich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. 10-CR-20705 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Darwich

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-4 ALI DARWICH, aka…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 10-CR-20705 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 22, 2013)