From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Daniels

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2012
470 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7599

04-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TERRENCE ARNEZ DANIELS, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Heck, Defendant - Appellant.

Terrence Arnez Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00736-CMC-2) Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrence Arnez Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terrence Arnez Daniels appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Daniels, No. 5:01-cr-00736-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2011). We deny Daniels' motion to seal the opinion and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Daniels

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2012
470 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TERRENCE ARNEZ DANIELS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

470 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2012)