From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Daniels

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
12-cr-00574-PJH-3 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

12-cr-00574-PJH-3

09-20-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DEVALIER DANIELS, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE

RE: DKT. NOS. 516, 518, 523

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The defendant in the above-captioned case has filed a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), and has also filed a motion to appoint counsel in connection with his motion for sentence reduction. See Dkt. 516, 518, see also Dkt. 523. Pursuant to this court's Miscellaneous Order 2019.01.25, defendant's motion was referred to the Federal Public Defender, who had “21 days to decide whether to assume representation of the defendant.” More than 21 days have now passed, and the FPD has not assumed representation.

There is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel with respect to a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). United States v. Townsend, 98 F.3d 510, 512-513 (9th Cir. 1996). Nor is there a statutory right to counsel in connection with a motion brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). “A person for whom counsel is appointed shall be represented at every stage of the proceedings from his initial appearance ... through appeal, including ancillary matters appropriate to the proceedings.” 18 U.S.C. 3006A(c). A motion brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) does not constitute an “ancillary matter[ ]” requiring counsel to be appointed. See, e.g., United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007 (5th Cir. 1995).

Because defendant is not entitled to appointed counsel for purposes of filing a motion brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), the motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. 518) is DENIED.

The court sets briefing deadlines on defendant's motion for reduction of sentence as follows: the government shall file an opposition, stipulation, or status report by October 4, 2021; the Probation Office is directed to submit a response to defendant's motion by October 4, 2021; if the motion is opposed, defendant may file a reply brief seven days after the opposition is filed. The motion will thereafter be submitted on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Daniels

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
12-cr-00574-PJH-3 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DEVALIER DANIELS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

12-cr-00574-PJH-3 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)