Opinion
S1 21 Cr. 729 (LAK)
12-21-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TATIANA DANIEL, a/k/a “Kimora Daniel,” Defendant.
DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Michael D. Neff Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY: TATIANA DANIEL EZRA SPILKE, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Law Offices of Ezra Spiike, PLLC
DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Michael D. Neff Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY:
TATIANA DANIEL EZRA SPILKE, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Law Offices of Ezra Spiike, PLLC
CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT
THE HONORABLE LEWIS A. KAPLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
WHEREAS, on or about November ___, 2022, TATIANA DANIEL, a/k/a “Kimora Daniel” (the “Defendant”), was charged in a one-count Superseding Information, S1 21 Cr. 729 (LAK) (the “Information”), with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Count One);
WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information;
WHEREAS, on or about November ____, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 (a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), a sum of money equal to $109,655 in United States currency, representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information;
WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $109,655 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and
WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Michael D. Neff, and the Defendant and her counsel, Ezra Spilke, Esq., that:
1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $109,655 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.
2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant TATIANA DANIEL, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.
3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.
4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property, 5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.
6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
7. The Court shall retainjufisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument, AGREED AND CONSENTED TO:
SO ORDERED: