From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Daniel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 18, 2006
202 F. App'x 203 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted September 11, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Kris A. McLean, Esq., Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John P. Rhodes, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, Allen Earl Daniel, Victor, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00006-DWM.

Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Allen Earl Daniel appeals from the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 82-day term of imprisonment. Daniel was originally convicted of four counts of robbery of a bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Daniel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Daniel has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw, and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.


Summaries of

United States v. Daniel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 18, 2006
202 F. App'x 203 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Daniel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Allen Earl DANIEL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

Citations

202 F. App'x 203 (9th Cir. 2006)