From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dacanay

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 10, 2021
1:20-mj-00004 SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-mj-00004 SAB

09-10-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HANZEL J. DACANAY, Defendant.

JEFFREY SPIVAK Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff. MATTHEW LEMKE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant.


JEFFREY SPIVAK Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff.

MATTHEW LEMKE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant.

DEFENDANT'S STATUS REPORT ON UNSUPERVISED PROBATION

PURSUANT to an order of this Court the Defendant hereby submits its status report on unsupervised probation:

Convicted of: Driving in Violation of Suspended/Revoked Privilege for Refusing a Chemical Test, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 4.2(b), CVC § 14601.5(a)
Sentence Dated: October 15, 2020
Review Hearing Dated: September 16, 2021
Probation Expires On: October 15, 2021

CONDITIONS OF UNSUPERVISED PROBATION:

[X] Obey all federal, state and local laws; and K Monetary Fines &Penalties in Total Amount of: $610.00 which Total Amount is made up of a Fine: $ 600 Special Assessment: $ 10.00 Processing Fee: $ 0 Restitution: $ 0
[X] Payment schedule of $ 60.00 per month by the 15th of each month.
[ ] Community Service hours Imposed of: 0
[ ] Other Conditions:

COMPLIANCE:

[X] Defendant has complied with and completed all conditions of probation described above.

Otherwise:

[X] Defendant has not been arrested, cited or charged with any federal, state or local criminal offenses since being placed on probation by this Court.
[X] To date, Defendant has paid a total of $ 610

GOVERNMENT POSITION:

[X] The Government agrees to the above-described compliance.
[ ] The Government disagrees with the following area(s) of compliance:

DEFENDANT'S REQUEST (OPTIONAL):

In light of the information detailed in this status report, the defendant moves for the following:
[X] that the review hearing set for 9/16/2021 at 10:00 am
[ ] be continued to at 10:00 a.m.; or
[X] be vacated.
[ ] that Defendant's appearance for the review hearing be waived.

The Court having considered the defendant's request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant's request is:

[X] GRANTED. The Court orders that the Review Hearing be vacated.
[ ] DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Dacanay

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 10, 2021
1:20-mj-00004 SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Dacanay

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HANZEL J. DACANAY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

1:20-mj-00004 SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2021)