From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Dabo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 22, 2022
S1 22 Cr. 52 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

S1 22 Cr. 52 (KPF)

12-22-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSETTE DABO, Defendant.

DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York ASHELY C. NICOLAS Assistant United States Attorney JOSETTE DABO MARK B. COMBINER, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant


DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York ASHELY C. NICOLAS Assistant United States Attorney

JOSETTE DABO MARK B. COMBINER, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/ MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE KATHERINE POLK FAILLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about December 22, 2022, JOSETTE DABO (the “Defendant”), was charged in an Information, SI 22 Cr. 52 (KPF) (the “Information”), with theft of government funds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641 and 2 (Count One);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Counts One of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Counts One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained;

WHEREAS, on or about December 22, 2022, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1) (C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $65,736 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, and cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney, Ashley C. Nicolas of counsel, and the Defendant, and her counsel, Mark Gombiner, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $65,736 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, JOSETTE DABO, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

AGREED AND CONSENTED TO:

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Dabo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 22, 2022
S1 22 Cr. 52 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Dabo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSETTE DABO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

S1 22 Cr. 52 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2022)