From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 16, 2015
Case No. 14-cr-20427 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 14-cr-20427

11-16-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-5 MELVIN ANDREW MORRIS, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE, STRIKING DOCUMENT, AND DIRECTING SERVICE

On November 3, 2015, Defendant Melvin Morris filed a document by mail titled "Local Criminal Rule 47. Motions[.]" See Def.'s Mot., ECF No. 177 (sic to formatting). The document is of poor quality and is barely legible. It was filed directly with the Clerk of Court by Morris. Morris is currently represented by counsel. The Government moved to strike the document and Morris's counsel concurred in the relief sought. See Gov't's Mot. Strike, ECF No. 178.

"It is well settled that there is no constitutional right to hybrid representation." United States v. Lowdermilk, 425 F. App'x 500, 504 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting United States v. Cromer, 389 F.3d 662, 681 n.12 (6th Cir.2004)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Absent any proof that Mr. Jacobs, Morris's counsel in this matter, is not able and competent to represent him, pro se appearances will not be entertained. See Lowdermilk, 425 F. App'x at 504 (finding no abuse of discretion in denying hybrid representation where defendant's lawyer was "competent and capable.") Generally, litigants must choose between proceeding pro se and proceeding with counsel. United States v. Mosely, 810 F.2d 93, 97 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 908 (6th Cir. 1970). The choice of one means of representation precludes reliance on the other. Id. Permitting deviation from this rule "is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court." Id. Morris has presented no proof that his defense will be compromised if he is not allowed to proceed pro se, or that his counsel is deficient in representing him. His document will be stricken.

Morris has already requested the substitution of one attorney. That request was granted. He will not be given another attorney absent a compelling showing of good cause. His final pretrial conference is scheduled for November 18, 2015 and his trial is set to commence on December 1, 2015. He is forewarned against attempting to delay the current proceedings by requesting new counsel.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Government's motion to strike, ECF No. 178, is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that the Defendant Melvin Morris's document titled "Local Criminal Rule 47. Motions," ECF No. 177, is STRICKEN.

It is further ORDERED that Defendant Morris's attorney, Stevens Jacobs, is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on Defendant Morris on or before November 18, 2015 and file a proof of service on the Court's docket. Dated: November 16, 2015

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on November 16, 2015.

s/Michael A. Sian

MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 16, 2015
Case No. 14-cr-20427 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-5 MELVIN ANDREW MORRIS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 16, 2015

Citations

Case No. 14-cr-20427 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 16, 2015)