From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. D-2 Raef Hamead

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 9, 2024
CRIMINAL 20-cr-20162 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 9, 2024)

Opinion

CRIMINAL 20-cr-20162

01-09-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-2 RAEF HAMEAD, R.Ph., D-3 TAREK FAKHURI, R.Ph., D-4 KINDY GHUSSIN, R.Ph., D-6 ALI ADBELRAZZAQ, R.Ph., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PERMIT ATTORNEY-CONDUCTED VOIR DIRE AND IMPLICIT BIAS TRAINING (ECF NO. 180)

LINDA V. PARKER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Tarek Fakhuri's motion to permit attorney-conducted voir dire and playing an implicit bias training video for the jury. (ECF No. 180.) Defendants Hamead, Ghussin and Abdelrazzaq join in Defendant Fakhuri's motion. (See ECF Nos. 181, 182, and 183.) While the Government does not agree with Defendants' underlying principle that the risk of implicit bias is heightened in this action, the Government agrees that the parties should be involved in voir dire of potential jurors. (See ECF No. 184 at PageID. 924.)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 24(a)(1), the Court “may examine prospective jurors or may permit the attorneys for the parties to do so.” See also Rosales-Lopez v. United States, 451 U.S. 182, 189 (1981) (“Because the obligation to impanel an impartial jury lies in the first instance with the trial judge, and because [they] must rely on [their] immediate perceptions, federal judges have been accorded ample discretion in determining how to best conduct the voir dire.”)

Having reviewed the motion, the Court will permit the attorneys, to conduct voir dire, subject to reasonable time limits, to be placed on the record before jury selection.

Further, Defendants ask the Court to show an unconscious bias video commissioned by a committee of judges and attorneys in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The Western District of Washington shows the video to each potential juror prior to jury selection in all cases. The video explains how unconscious bias can negatively impact perception. It instructs jurors to consider the assumptions they bring and asks them to be aware of those assumptions throughout the trial. The video has been played in this District, as well as other districts prior to jury selection. See United States v. Ramadan, No. 17-20595, 2021 WL 2895568, at *4 (E.D. Mich. July 9, 2021) (collecting cases).

In an effort to ensure Defendants receive a full and fair trial, the Court will permit the playing of the implicit bias video.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Permit Attorney-Conducted Voir Dire and Implicit Bias Training (ECF No. 180) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

United States v. D-2 Raef Hamead

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 9, 2024
CRIMINAL 20-cr-20162 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 9, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. D-2 Raef Hamead

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-2 RAEF HAMEAD, R.Ph., D-3 TAREK…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 9, 2024

Citations

CRIMINAL 20-cr-20162 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 9, 2024)