From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. D-1 Andre Demon Hurston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2016
Case Number 13-20495 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2016)

Opinion

Case Number 13-20495

10-04-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-1 ANDRE DEMON HURSTON, Defendant.


Elizabeth A. Stafford United States Magistrate Judge ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE , SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §2255 (ECF No. 183)

On February 10, 2015, Defendant Hurston, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se filed the instant motion. The Court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Stafford for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) (ECF No.186). The Government responded to Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 202), and Defendant filed a Reply on November 25, 2015. Magistrate Judge Stafford recommended denying Defendant Hurston's Motion (R&R, ECF No. 259) on December 18, 2015. Defendant filed an objection to the magistrate judge's R&R (ECF No. 268). On January 4, 2016, Defendant filed an Amended Objection to the R&R (ECF No. 271).

The Court has read Defendant's objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 268) and his amended objections.

Basically, Objection #268 argues the the factual evidence does not support his plea conviction sentencing scoring. The Court finds that his guideline scoring was correct.

As to his Amended Objections (ECF No. 271), the Court finds that his specific offense characteristics and enhancements were all properly applied in his sentencing after his plea to Conspiracy to Commit Interference with Commerce by Robbery, 18 U.S.C. §1951(A). A firearm was brandished during the carjacking robbery, controlled substances were stolen, and the loss category was correct.

The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and DENIES Defendant's §2255 motion for the reasons well set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and in the instant opinion.

SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 4, 2016

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on October 4, 2016.

s/Deborah Tofil

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. D-1 Andre Demon Hurston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2016
Case Number 13-20495 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. D-1 Andre Demon Hurston

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. D-1 ANDRE DEMON HURSTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2016

Citations

Case Number 13-20495 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 4, 2016)