From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Czuprynski

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 17, 1994
16 F.3d 704 (6th Cir. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-1079.

February 17, 1994.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

United States v. Czuprynski

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 17, 1994
16 F.3d 704 (6th Cir. 1994)
Case details for

United States v. Czuprynski

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. EDWARD M. CZUPRYNSKI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 17, 1994

Citations

16 F.3d 704 (6th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Czuprynski

The majority concluded that the search of defendant's home and office was unconstitutional as the warrant…