Opinion
20-7553
09-14-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLARENCE EDWARD CYRUS, a/k/a CC, a/k/a Red, Defendant-Appellant.
Clarence Edward Cyrus, Appellant Pro Se. Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: August 27, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (4:99-cr-00221-CMC-1)
Clarence Edward Cyrus, Appellant Pro Se.
Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Edward Cyrus appeals the district court's order denying his motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cyrus, No. 4:99-cr-00221-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED