From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Curtis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 19, 2012
No. 10-30155 (9th Cir. Apr. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-30155 D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00086-SEH

04-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BILLY JOE CURTIS, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Billy Joe Curtis appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Curtis's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Curtis has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Curtis's conviction. Curtis waived his right to appeal his sentence. We accordingly dismiss the appeal of the sentence in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.


Summaries of

United States v. Curtis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 19, 2012
No. 10-30155 (9th Cir. Apr. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Curtis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BILLY JOE CURTIS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 19, 2012

Citations

No. 10-30155 (9th Cir. Apr. 19, 2012)