From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cunningham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2014
569 F. App'x 914 (11th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-14583 D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00076-GAP-KRS-1

06-25-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABDUL CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH]


Non-Argument Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Abdul Cunningham in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Cunningham and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cunningham's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Cunningham

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2014
569 F. App'x 914 (11th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABDUL CUNNINGHAM…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 25, 2014

Citations

569 F. App'x 914 (11th Cir. 2014)