From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Culling

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 23, 2021
2:20-cr-29 WBS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cr-29 WBS

11-23-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant has moved for a 36-hour furlough so that he may attend the funeral of his aunt. (Docket No. 67.) For the reasons discussed by the government in its opposition (Docket No. 68), defendant has not met his burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the community under 18 U.S.C. § 3143. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Culling

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 23, 2021
2:20-cr-29 WBS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Culling

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HACK TOWNSEND CULLING, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 23, 2021

Citations

2:20-cr-29 WBS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2021)