Opinion
CAUSE NO.: 2:15-cr-16-JTM-JEM
04-17-2015
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT BRANDON JUAN CRUZ TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Upon Defendant Brandon Juan Cruz's request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge John E. Martin on April 16, 2015, with the consent of Defendant Cruz, counsel for Defendant Cruz, and counsel for the United States of America.
The hearing on Defendant Cruz's plea of guilty was in full compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.
In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Cruz under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Cruz,
I FIND as follows:
(1) that Defendant Cruz understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is offered;
(2) that Defendant Cruz understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination;
(3) that Defendant Cruz understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Cruz understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;
(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Cruz has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;
(5) that Defendant Cruz is competent to plead guilty;
(6) that Defendant Cruz understands that his answers may later be used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;
(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Cruz's plea; and further,
I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Brandon Juan Cruz's plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Cruz be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant Cruz be adjudged guilty, sentencing before Senior Judge James T. Moody will be set at a later date by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
So ORDERED this 17th day of April, 2015.
s/ John E. Martin
MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT