From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 12, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0242 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0242

03-12-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABRAHAM CRUZ


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2012, upon consideration of the motion to acquit or dismiss (Doc. 37), filed pro se by defendant Abraham Cruz, and it appearing that defendant is represented by counsel, Heidi R. Freese, Esquire, but filed the instant motion without assistance therefrom, see United States v. D'Amario, 268 F. App'x 179, 180 (3d Cir. 2008) ("The Constitution does not confer a right to proceed simultaneously by counsel and pro se . . . ."); see also United States v. Vampire Nation, 451 F.3d 189, 206 n.17 (3d Cir. 2006), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 37) to acquit or dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to defendant's right to file motions seeking similar relief with the assistance of counsel.

___________________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 12, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0242 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABRAHAM CRUZ

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:11-CR-0242 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 12, 2012)