From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crutchfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 5, 2015
CR-14-00051 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2015)

Opinion

          STEVEN G. KALAR, Federal Public Defender, VARELL L. FULLER, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Jose, CA, Counsel for Defendant CRUTCHFIELD.

          JAY RORTY, Counsel for defendant Toliver.


          STIPULATION AND [] ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE, CONVERTING MOTIONS HEARING TO STATUS HEARING

          RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

         STIPULATION

         Defendants Justin Crutchfield and Demontae Toliver, by and through their respective counsel, and the United States, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Amie Rooney, hereby stipulate that, with the Court's approval, the briefing schedule for motions be vacated and the motions hearing date currently set for Monday, June 8, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., be converted to a status hearing.

         The government is in the process of reviewing extensive reciprocal discovery recently produced by the defense. In addition, the parties share a good faith belief that the case is likely to resolve by way of a negotiated pretrial disposition. The Court has already excluded time up to and including June 8, 2015, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         [] ORDER ________

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, upon stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial motions briefing schedule is VACATED.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions hearing currently set for Monday, June 8, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., shall be converted to a status hearing.

         The Court has previously found that time up to and including June 8, 2015, is properly excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Crutchfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 5, 2015
CR-14-00051 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Crutchfield

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN EVERETT CRUTCHFIELD and…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 5, 2015

Citations

CR-14-00051 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2015)