From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crowder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 1, 2012
472 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6173

05-01-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHEVELLE CROWDER, Defendant - Appellant.

Chevelle Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Rene Day, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00002-JLK-2)

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chevelle Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Rene Day, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Chevelle Crowder appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). As we have recognized, however, a district court has no authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order denying a 3582(c) motion. United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). And in any event, it is evident from the record that Crowder is ineligible for the sentence reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Crowder, No. 4:08-cr-00002-JLK-2 (W.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Crowder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 1, 2012
472 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Crowder

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHEVELLE CROWDER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

472 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2012)