From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cross

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 7, 2016
Case No. 1:16-MJ-201 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-MJ-201 Charging Dist. Case No. 2:16-cr-102

11-07-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL CROSS


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant Michael Cross ("Defendant") came before the Court on November 2, 2016, in accordance with Rules 5 and 5.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for an initial appearance on an Indictment out of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division.

After being sworn in due form of law, Defendant was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination under the 5th Amendment and his right to counsel under the 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Court determined that Defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and that he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Consequently, the Court APPOINTED Anthony Martinez of Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. to represent Defendant with respect to further proceedings in this case in the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Defendant was furnished with a copy of the Indictment and had an opportunity to review that document with his attorney. The Court determined that Defendant was capable of being able to read and understand the Indictment. At the Court's request, AUSA Michael Porter explained to Defendant the offenses detailed in the Indictment. Defendant acknowledged that he understood the offenses with which he is charged in the Indictment.

The Court explained to Defendant that he had a right to an identity hearing to determine whether he is the person named in the Indictment; a right to production of the warrant (or a certified copy or electronic copy); and a hearing on the government's motion for detention. The Court further explained to Defendant that he had a right to transfer these proceedings to the charging district, which, in this case, is the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division.

Following consultation with his counsel, Defendant agreed to waive an identity hearing, production of the warrant, and a detention hearing in this Court, and to request transfer of those proceedings to the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division. The Court confirmed that Defendant would be entitled to such proceedings in the charging district at a date and time set by that Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that:

1. The Government's motion that Defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BOND pending further proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division, is GRANTED.

2. The U.S. Marshal shall transport Defendant to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division.

3. The Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee shall promptly transmit all documents relating to this case to the Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division.

4. The Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Norfolk Division, shall immediately notify the United States Attorney for such district of Defendant's arrival so that further proceedings may be promptly scheduled.

ENTER.

s/ Christopher H . Steger

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Cross

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 7, 2016
Case No. 1:16-MJ-201 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 7, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Cross

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL CROSS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Nov 7, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:16-MJ-201 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 7, 2016)