From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crook

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2024
3:04-cr-59-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)

Opinion

3:04-cr-59-MOC-DSC 3:04-cr-58-MOC-DSC

11-18-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMUEL P. CROOK, Defendant.


ORDER

Max O. Cogburn Jr. United States District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Pro Se Motion for New Trial, (3:04-cr-58, Doc. No. 260, 3:04-cr-59, Doc. No. 227).

Defendant is represented by counsel in this matter. Under L.Cr.R. 41.7(g), the Court typically does not entertain pro se motions by parties who are already represented by counsel. Defendant is encouraged to consult with his counsel about filing any appropriate motions on his behalf, and the Court will gladly hear any motion defendant's counsel makes on his behalf. Having thus considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Pro Se Motion for New Trial, (3:04-cr-58, Doc. No. 260, 3:04-cr-59, Doc. No. 227), is DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

United States v. Crook

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Nov 18, 2024
3:04-cr-59-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Crook

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMUEL P. CROOK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Nov 18, 2024

Citations

3:04-cr-59-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2024)