From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crook

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2016
643 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-7791 No. 15-7793

04-01-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK, Defendant - Appellant.

Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1) Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Paul Crook appeals from the district court's order denying his motions filed in his related criminal cases. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2015). We deny Crook's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Crook

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2016
643 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Crook

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 1, 2016

Citations

643 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2016)