From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crawford

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 10, 1971
446 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 30632 Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5th Cir., see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

August 10, 1971.

John F. Tomlin, Pecos, Tex. (Ct. Appt.) for defendant-appellant.

Seagal V. Wheatley, U.S. Atty., Haskell Shelton, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ralph E. Harris, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.



In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by John F. Tomlin, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20. See also Minor v. United States, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521.


Summaries of

United States v. Crawford

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 10, 1971
446 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

United States v. Crawford

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Calvin CRAWFORD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Aug 10, 1971

Citations

446 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

United States v. Tappen

In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,…

United States v. Sheppard

His conviction is AFFIRMED.See Government of Canal Zone v. O'Connor, 460 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1972); United…