From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Crandle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 27, 2013
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 10-35-JJB (M.D. La. Sep. 27, 2013)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 10-35-JJB

2013-09-27

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAWRENCE J. CRANDLE, JR.


RULING AND ORDER

The court has carefully considered the motion to vacate under §2255, as supplemented by defendant (docs. 103, 108 and 121), the record, the law applicable to this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr., dated August 28, 2013 (doc. no. 136), to which no objection has been filed.

The court finds that the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge are clearly correct. The report and recommendation is hereby APPROVED and ADOPTED as the court's reasons herein.

Accordingly; IT IS ORDERED that defendant's motion to vacate (doc. docs. 103, 108 and 121) under §2255 be DENIED.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 27, 2013.

_______________

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

United States v. Crandle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 27, 2013
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 10-35-JJB (M.D. La. Sep. 27, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Crandle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAWRENCE J. CRANDLE, JR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 10-35-JJB (M.D. La. Sep. 27, 2013)