From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cox

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 27, 2023
CRIM 21-369 (SDW) (D.N.J. Apr. 27, 2023)

Opinion

CRIM 21-369 (SDW)

04-27-2023

UNITED STATES v. RAHJON COX


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS

Susan D. Wigenton United States District Judge

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[˅]That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[˅]That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

(1) the ongoing COVID-19 health emergency; (2) defendant's desire to proceed with this plea hearing remotely to advance the resolution of this case; and (3) defendant's consent.

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[˅] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.
[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Cox

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 27, 2023
CRIM 21-369 (SDW) (D.N.J. Apr. 27, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. RAHJON COX

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Apr 27, 2023

Citations

CRIM 21-369 (SDW) (D.N.J. Apr. 27, 2023)