From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cortez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-CR-00376 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-CR-00376 LJO

01-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ZEFERINA SALGADO GUZMAN DE CORTEZ, VICTORINO EPIFANIO BAZANTE PACHECO, and FLORENCIO MORALES-SOLANO, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and requested by and between Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney and Kimberly A. Sanchez, Assistant U.S. Attorney and Rudy Banuelos, attorney for Zeferina Salgado Guzman de Cortez; Roger Litman, attorney for Victorino Epifanio Bazante Pacheco; and H. Ty Kharazi, attorney for Florencio Morales-Solano that the status conference set for January 23, 2012 be continued to April 2, 2012. The parties further stipulate and request that the Court set March 26, 2012 as the due date for the Government's response to defendants Zeferina Salgado Guzman de Cortez's and Florencio Morales-Solano's motions for discovery. The government has provided additional discovery after the filing of the defendants' motions, and the parties have agreed to further review the discovery provided to determine what outstanding discovery issues exist and to discuss proposed resolutions to the cases. The parties need additional time to accomplish those goals. Additionally, the parties have communicated with respect to a date that all counsel are available to appear in Court, and the earliest possible date is April 2, 2012. The parties further request the Court to enter an Order finding that the "ends of justice" served by a continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that the delay occasioned by such continuance is excluded from the

Act's time limits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ___________________________

KIMBERLY A. SANCHEZ

Assistant U.S. Attorney

___________________________

RUDY BANUELOS

Attorney for Zeferina Salgado

Guzman de Cortez

___________________________

ROGER LITMAN

Attorney for Victorino Epifanio

Bazante Pacheco

___________________________

H. TY KHARAZI

Attorney for Florencio Morales

Solano
Good cause exists. Time is excluded. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Cortez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-CR-00376 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Cortez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ZEFERINA SALGADO GUZMAN DE CORTEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-CR-00376 LJO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)