From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Copeland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Oct 19, 2020
CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CR-99-3-TLS-JEM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CR-99-3-TLS-JEM

10-19-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK COPELAND


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [ECF No. 199], filed on September 30, 2020. The Defendant has waived objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

The Court finds that the change of plea conducted by video teleconference complies with Section 15002(b)(2)(A) of the CARES Act. First, General Orders 2020-08, 2020-20, and 2020-29 authorized video conferencing for felony pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, finding that such hearings cannot be conducted in person without seriously jeopardizing public health and safety as a result of the current COVID-19 pandemic.

The Court also finds that the Defendant's felony plea in this case cannot be delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice due to Defendant's desire to admit his guilt, plead guilty, and proceed to sentencing in a timely manner and the government and public interest in timely processing criminal matters.

Finally, the Defendant consented to video teleconferencing after consultation with counsel. See CARES ACT § 15002(b)(4). On September 30, 2020, the same day as the Change of Plea Hearing, the Defendant submitted a Consent to Appear by Video Teleconference [ECF No. 196], in which he provided his consent for court proceedings to be conducted by video teleconference and indicated that his consent was provided freely and voluntarily and that no threats or promises were made to compel him to sign the form. Defendant also orally consented to proceed by video teleconference and waived his right to appear in person. ECF No. 198.

The Court being duly advised, ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation [ECF No. 199] in their entirety and ACCEPTS the recommended disposition. Subject to this Court's consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c), if applicable and necessary, the plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED, and the Defendant is adjudged GUILTY of the offense.

The notice of sentencing and pre-sentence scheduling deadlines will be issued by separate order.

SO ORDERED on October 19, 2020.

s/ Theresa L. Springmann

JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Copeland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Oct 19, 2020
CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CR-99-3-TLS-JEM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 19, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Copeland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK COPELAND

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 19, 2020

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 2:18-CR-99-3-TLS-JEM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 19, 2020)