Opinion
21-6595
09-16-2022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LARAY KESHAWN COPELAND, a/k/a Ray Ray, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LARAY KESHAWN COPELAND, a/k/a Ray Ray, Defendant-Appellant.
Laray Keshawn Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 9, 2022
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:09-cr-00157-BO-1; 7:19-cr-00081-BO-1)
Laray Keshawn Copeland, Appellant Pro Se.
David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Laray Keshawn Copeland appeals the district court's orders denying his motions for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See United States v. Copeland, No. 7:09-cr-00157-BO-1 (E.D. N.C. Apr. 9, 2021); United States v. Copeland, No. 7:19-cr-00081-BO-1 (E.D. N.C. Apr. 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.