From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Cooley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 14, 2021
No. 17-30022 (9th Cir. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

17-30022

07-14-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court D.C. No. 1:16-cr-00042-SPW-1

Before: BERZON, THACKER, [*] and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Supreme Court reversed our judgment in this case and remanded to this Court for further proceedings. United States v. Cooley, 141 S.Ct. 1638 (2021). The District Court did not decide the following question: If-as the Supreme Court held-the tribal officer otherwise possessed the relevant authority, "whether the officer had probable cause for a search or arrest, or reasonable suspicion for an investigatory detention." United States v. Cooley, 919 F.3d 1135, 1145 (9th Cir. 2019). Accordingly, the case is hereby REMANDED to the District Court to address that question. See id. ("We rely on Fourth Amendment jurisprudence to analyze the validity of a search or seizure under [the Indian Civil Rights Act].") (citing United States v. Becerra-Garcia, 397 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2005)). IT IS SO ORDERED. [*] The Stephanie Dawn Thacker, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting by designation.


Summaries of

United States v. Cooley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 14, 2021
No. 17-30022 (9th Cir. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Cooley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

No. 17-30022 (9th Cir. Jul. 14, 2021)