From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Conceptus, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Aug 21, 2015
13-4077 BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2015)

Opinion

          MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney, ALEX G. TSE, Chief, Civil Division, KIMBERLY FRIDAY, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California.

          BENJAMIN C. MIZER, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, MICHAEL D. GRANSTON, JAMIE A. YAVELBERG, LISA K. SAMUELS, Trial Attorneys, Civil Division, Washington, D.C. Attorneys for the United States of America.

          ELIZABETH VOORHIES, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State, of California, and on behalf of the Plaintiff, States.


          CONSENT TO DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER

          BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), the United States consents to the dismissal of this action without prejudice to the United States. The United States has conferred with Elizabeth Voorhies, Deputy Attorney General for the State of California. Ms. Voorhies has represented to the United States that the States named as plaintiffs in this qui tam suit also consent to dismissal of this action without prejudice.

         The United States requests that the Court unseal: (1) Relator's Complaint; (2) the summons, if any; (3) the scheduling order; (4) Relator's Notice of Dismissal; and (5) this Consent to Dismissal and Proposed Order. The United States requests that all other contents of the Court's file in this matter (including, but not limited to, any applications filed by the United States for extensions of the sixty-day investigative period, any applications for partial lifting of the seal, and any orders previously entered in this matter) remain under seal and not be made public or served upon defendants.

         A proposed order accompanies this notice.

         CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), a undersigned hereby attests that Lisa K. Samuels and Elizabeth Voorhies have concurred in the filing of this document.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER TO UNSEAL

         The United States and the States named as plaintiffs having consented to dismissal of this action without prejudice pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The Complaint, the summons, the scheduling order, Relator's Notice of Dismissal, this Order, and the accompanying Consent to Dismissal are hereby unsealed.

         2. Any applications and/or declarations that have been filed under seal by the United States for an extension of the sixty-day investigative period or for any other reason shall remain under seal and not be made public or served upon the defendants.

         3. The seal shall be lifted as to all other matters occurring in this action after the date of this Order.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Conceptus, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Aug 21, 2015
13-4077 BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Conceptus, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the STATES OF CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Aug 21, 2015

Citations

13-4077 BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2015)