From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 1966
257 F. Supp. 644 (W.D. Pa. 1966)

Opinion

Misc. No. 3967.

March 31, 1966.

John Wakeley in pro. per.

Walter E. Alessandroni, Atty. Gen. of Commonwealth of Pa., Harrisburg, Pa., for the Commonwealth of Pa. and others.


MEMORANDUM and ORDER


And now, this 31st day of March, 1966, leave is hereby granted the above named relator to file his petition without prepayment of costs.

Said petition challenges the constitutionality of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's "Post Conviction Hearing Act," No. 554, effective March 1, 1966, seeks injunctive relief, and prays for the appointment of a three-judge court under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2281. Petitioner does not allege that he is presently seeking habeas corpus relief, nor does he set forth sufficient facts to show an injury or threat to any of his rights. Moreover, it is clear that the Act under attack does not abrogate the remedy of habeas corpus as alleged, but rather encompasses such relief and merely establishes a defined procedure. The remedy remains. The petition, therefore, does not present a substantial claim of unconstitutionality, and it is hereby denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 1966
257 F. Supp. 644 (W.D. Pa. 1966)
Case details for

United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. John WAKELEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 31, 1966

Citations

257 F. Supp. 644 (W.D. Pa. 1966)

Citing Cases

United States v. Russell

For these reasons, petitioner claims that his remedy in the State courts is inadequate and ineffective to…

Moss v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Said petition challenges the constitutionality of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's "Post Conviction Hearing…